A closer look at the connection

Falls-Related Fractures / Orthopedic Injury

Potentially secondary to Peripheral Neuropathy (Service-Connected)

Strong research evidence38 CFR § 3.310Research record updated

This pairing is a research starting point. Service connection depends on evidence that Peripheral Neuropathy (Service-Connected) caused or aggravated Falls-Related Fractures / Orthopedic Injury in your case.

VeteranHQ · AI-assisted research · Educational information. Claims guidance checked September 9, 2026; this is not a clinical review of the pairing.

01 / The connection

How the conditions may be related

Peripheral neuropathy causes falls and resultant fractures through three converging mechanisms. First, sensory neuropathy ablates the cutaneous and proprioceptive afferent signals from the feet that are essential for postural stability — without accurate ground contact and joint position information, balance is profoundly impaired. Second, motor neuropathy weakens intrinsic foot muscles and ankle dorsiflexors (foot drop), causing tripping, stumbling, and inability to catch oneself. Third, autonomic neuropathy causes orthostatic hypotension — the sudden blood pressure drop upon standing that produces pre-syncopal lightheadedness and sudden falls. Studies of diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients document 15–25% annual fall rates (3-fold higher than non-neuropathic controls) and hip fracture rates 2–3-fold above the general population. Each fracture is a direct physical consequence of the underlying neuropathy.

Disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected.
The rule in your case

A disability may qualify for secondary service connection when evidence shows that an existing service-connected condition caused it or increased its severity beyond natural progression. These are the causation and aggravation paths in 38 CFR § 3.310. Having both conditions does not, by itself, establish the connection.

02 / Supporting research

Look at the evidence behind the pairing

  • Cavanagh PR et al. (2007) J Rehabil Res Dev (falls in diabetic neuropathy)
  • Maurer MS et al. (2005) Diabetes Care (orthostatic hypotension and falls)
  • Schwartz AV et al. (2002) Diabetes Care (hip fractures and diabetes/neuropathy)
  • Tanaka S et al. (2007) J Bone Miner Metab.
What “strong” means here

Strong, Moderate, and Emerging are research categories assigned within this library. They are not VA determinations, promises of service connection, or estimates of your approval chances. Read the supporting research and consider how it applies to your own history. Association between conditions does not, by itself, establish that one caused or aggravated the other.

03 / Preparing your evidence

Build the link to your own history

A nexus is the link between the two conditions. Relevant evidence can include medical records, a reasoned medical opinion, and, in some circumstances, lay evidence. A private nexus letter can help, but is not universally required. An opinion should explain how the evidence in your case supports causation or aggravation, rather than only naming a possible association.

You do not always need a private nexus letter

VA may arrange a C&P examination or request a medical opinion when needed to decide an initial or Supplemental Claim. You can submit an opinion from a treating or independent clinician, but VA does not require everyone to purchase a private nexus letter. Its duty to assist does not guarantee a favorable opinion or a granted claim.

Pairing-specific research notes

Neurology records documenting peripheral neuropathy and its severity (sensory loss, proprioception deficit, motor weakness, autonomous dysfunction). Fracture records (emergency department visits, orthopedic surgeon records, X-ray/CT documenting fracture location and treatment). A nexus letter from your neurologist or physiatrist explicitly attributing the fall leading to fracture to neuropathic sensory and motor deficits is the critical evidence. File fracture residuals (post-fracture arthritis, hardware complications, malunion) as tertiary conditions. Note: Specific rating depends on fracture site — hip fracture (DC 5054/5255), wrist fracture (DC 5215), vertebral fracture (DC 5285). File each fracture site under its most appropriate diagnostic code for maximum rating accuracy.

Check VA’s evidence requirements
04 / Understanding ratings

A diagnosis does not guarantee an additional rating

A separately compensable secondary disability may receive its own evaluation, which VA combines with other ratings under 38 CFR § 4.25. Separate diagnoses do not always mean separate ratings: § 4.14 prohibits compensating the same manifestations more than once, and some body systems have additional rating rules. For aggravation, the compensable increase must account for the baseline severity.

The formula applies the whole-person concept: a 50% combined existing rating plus a new 30% rating yields 65% (rounded to 70%), not 80%.

This example starts with an unrounded combined value. If your current award was already rounded, use your individual ratings to calculate the new total. VA rounds to the nearest ten only after combining all applicable ratings.

Read the combined ratings rule

Both causation and aggravation are forms of secondary service connection. Aggravation means an increase in severity attributable to a service-connected condition, beyond natural progression. Permanent worsening is not required under Ward v. Wilkie (2019). Section 3.310(b) also requires medical evidence establishing a baseline level of severity; VA deducts the baseline and any natural progression when determining the compensable increase.

Explore your combined rating

See how separately assigned ratings combine using VA math.

Open the calculator

Secondary claims, explained

What is a secondary service-connected condition?

A disability may qualify for secondary service connection when evidence shows that an existing service-connected condition caused it or increased its severity beyond natural progression. These are the causation and aggravation paths in 38 CFR § 3.310. Having both conditions does not, by itself, establish the connection.

What evidence can establish the connection?

A nexus is the link between the two conditions. Relevant evidence can include medical records, a reasoned medical opinion, and, in some circumstances, lay evidence. A private nexus letter can help, but is not universally required. An opinion should explain how the evidence in your case supports causation or aggravation, rather than only naming a possible association.

Do I have to pay for a private nexus letter?

VA may arrange a C&P examination or request a medical opinion when needed to decide an initial or Supplemental Claim. You can submit an opinion from a treating or independent clinician, but VA does not require everyone to purchase a private nexus letter. Its duty to assist does not guarantee a favorable opinion or a granted claim.

Does aggravation have to be permanent?

Both causation and aggravation are forms of secondary service connection. Aggravation means an increase in severity attributable to a service-connected condition, beyond natural progression. Permanent worsening is not required under Ward v. Wilkie (2019). Section 3.310(b) also requires medical evidence establishing a baseline level of severity; VA deducts the baseline and any natural progression when determining the compensable increase.

Will a secondary condition get a separate rating?

A separately compensable secondary disability may receive its own evaluation, which VA combines with other ratings under 38 CFR § 4.25. Separate diagnoses do not always mean separate ratings: § 4.14 prohibits compensating the same manifestations more than once, and some body systems have additional rating rules. For aggravation, the compensable increase must account for the baseline severity.

When can a secondary claim’s effective date begin?

An effective date generally depends on when VA received the claim and when entitlement arose, with exceptions. A qualifying intent to file may preserve an earlier claim date if VA receives the completed claim within one year. Review deadlines and continuous pursuit can affect the date; a prior denial does not automatically establish an earlier effective date.