DC 6090STRONG evidenceLast verified: MAR 11, 2026

Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency Secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency can develop as a service-connected secondary condition to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) when a medical nexus links the two under 38 CFR § 3.310. The strength of medical evidence for this specific pairing is strong. TBI disrupts the complex neural circuits governing binocular vision, accommodation, and smooth pursuit eye movements.

How is Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency connected to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)?

TBI disrupts the complex neural circuits governing binocular vision, accommodation, and smooth pursuit eye movements. The vergence system depends on coordinated signaling between the frontal eye fields, superior colliculus, and the midbrain vergence center — all of which are vulnerable to DAI and contrecoup injury. Post-TBI convergence insufficiency (CI) occurs in 25-30% of TBI patients, producing diplopia, reading difficulty, headaches with near work, and asthenopia. Additionally, damage to the dorsal visual stream (parietal cortex) impairs spatial processing and visual-motor integration, creating functional visual processing deficits even with normal visual acuity.

“Disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected.”
— 38 CFR § 3.310(a), Disabilities that are proximately due to, or aggravated by, service-connected disease or injury

What evidence supports claiming Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency as secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)?

Ciuffreda KJ et al. (2007) Optometry (oculomotor dysfunction after TBI); Alvarez TL et al. (2012) Brain Inj (convergence insufficiency prevalence and mechanisms after TBI).

How do I file a secondary claim for Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency?

Comprehensive neuro-optometric or neuro-ophthalmologic examination documenting near point of convergence (NPC), vergence ranges, accommodative amplitude, and saccadic/pursuit function. Document reading difficulties and functional limitations. An optometrist or ophthalmologist specializing in neuro-rehabilitation should provide the nexus letter. Consider under DC 6090 (diplopia) or as a TBI residual under 8045 depending on the primary symptom presentation.

How does the VA rate Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency?

Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency is rated under 38 CFR Part 4 using the diagnostic code assigned to that condition. The VA evaluates the severity of the secondary condition independently and assigns a rating from 0% to 100% in increments defined in the rating schedule. That rating is then combined with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and all other service-connected conditions using the combined ratings formula under § 4.25.

Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency is rated under DC 6090 in 38 CFR Part 4.

Common Questions — Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency Secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Can Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency be claimed as secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)?

Yes. Under 38 CFR § 3.310(a), any disability proximately caused or chronically worsened by a service-connected condition is itself service-connected. Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency is a documented secondary pairing for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with strong medical evidence. A nexus letter from a qualified physician linking the two conditions is the most reliable way to establish this connection.

What evidence proves Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency is caused by Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)?

The gold standard is a private nexus opinion stating — to at least a 50% probability ("at least as likely as not") — that the secondary condition was caused or aggravated by the primary service-connected condition. Peer-reviewed medical literature supporting the physiological mechanism strengthens the nexus. Treatment records documenting the onset or worsening of the secondary condition in temporal relation to the primary are supporting evidence.

Does the VA combine or separately rate Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency?

The VA rates Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency separately under its own 38 CFR Part 4 diagnostic code, then combines it with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and all other service-connected ratings using the combined ratings formula under § 4.25. The formula applies the whole-person concept: a 50% combined existing rating plus a new 30% rating yields 65% (rounded to 70%), not 80%.

What legal standard applies to secondary service connection?

38 CFR § 3.310(a) states: "Disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected." The aggravation variant under § 3.310(b) applies where the primary condition permanently worsens a pre-existing disability beyond its natural progression. Both standards require a showing of nexus — a medical or scientific link between the primary condition and the secondary.

How strong is the medical evidence for this pairing?

The medical evidence supporting Visual Processing Disorder / Convergence Insufficiency as secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is rated strong. TBI disrupts the complex neural circuits governing binocular vision, accommodation, and smooth pursuit eye movements. The vergence system depends on coordinated signaling between the frontal eye fields, superior colliculus, and the midbrain vergence center — all of which are vulnerable to DAI and contrecoup injury. Post-TBI convergence insufficiency (CI) occurs in 25-30% of TBI patients, producing diplopia, reading difficulty, headaches with near work, and asthenopia. Additionally, damage to the dorsal visual stream (parietal cortex) impairs spatial processing and visual-motor integration, creating functional visual processing deficits even with normal visual acuity.

Do I need a nexus letter for a secondary claim?

The VA will not solicit nexus evidence on your behalf for secondary claims. In practice, a written nexus opinion from a private physician or independent medical examiner is essential — the VA's Compensation & Pension (C&P) examiner is not required to produce a favorable nexus opinion, and the VA has discretion to weigh competing opinions. Submitting a private nexus letter at the time of filing is the most reliable strategy.

Get a Full Secondary Condition Analysis

VeteranHQ cross-references your complete medical history against the full secondary condition database, surfacing every secondary claim opportunity for your specific service-connected conditions.

Start Your Free Analysis